Is There a ‘T’ in Team?
I recall my senior
year, when we rode a superb team effort in the latter half of the season to a
win over state 2nd-ranked Hancock and a sectional title. Our motto
was “There is no ‘I’ in team, we win as a team, and we lose
as a team”. I remember seeing it in print somewhere, I can’t
remember where it was……but it said “There is no ‘T’
in team….” and so on. No relevance, I just thought it was pretty
funny at the time, and anyone else who saw it must have thought our team was
full of dufus-es. Haha,
just a fond memory…
I think and hope
the line can apply to our team now. We don’t blow people out like teams
with Rich Mokay, Brian Neale, and Nate Rockefeller
used to do. On the other hand, the current pack of ‘Dogs has a much
better record in the close games than any of those previous teams do.
I remember in the
2007 era making the statement that if you gave me a team like that year’s
Walton crew (which rolled to the state Class D title) or instead gave me a team
of raw NFL-caliber talent but with the worst coaching you could possibly
imagine, I’d take the Class D TEAM any day of the week. NFL-caliber
athletes do not a team make. It’s all about becoming something different.
It’s nice to have kids with high capabilities, but football is an
incredibly complex game, and it takes so much more than fast twitch muscles and
L-B-S’s.
Walton is in so
many seasons the epitome of this….of making a team that is so much better
than its athletes. Delhi has had a pretty good share of them as well. While we
do have a pretty good amount of talent this year, I’d love to see us
really cross the line where we become more than the sum of our parts.
Bored as I am at
times, I definitely get to overthinking things. So, I got thinking about the
general “mechanics” of a play in football one day. I kind of broke
the play up into 2 parts…first comes the “set-up”, then comes the “execution”. In my mind the
set-up phase contributes 2/3 to 3/4 of the success of the play, while the
execution phase contributes the balance. The way I’m thinking about these
is probably different than what they sound like, so I’ll explain further.
The whole point of
the set-up phase is to get the right people to the right place at the right
time. It might be to get a running back with the ball in front of a sizeable
hole. It might be to get the QB ready to throw a pass to a receiver who is open
down the field. Or it might be to get a linebacker filling a hole where the RB
is about to come through. There is strategy to get the play developed
correctly, and there is skill involved by the players to get to where they need
to be. In my mind, this phase is 50% about coaching (placement of the “chess
pieces”, ability to communicate it to the players, ability to teach the
necessary skills, etc.), 25% about the coachability and
mental capabilities of the players (can they remember what they need to do, can
they make reads, how much effort will they put into it, etc.), and 25% the
athletic ability of the players (can they block, can they react quickly, can
they run fast to get open).
The gaining or not
gaining of the yards mechanically happens in the execution phase. Now that the
hole is there, the RB moves forward. Now that the receiver is open, the pass is
made and hopefully caught. Now that the guy with the ball is in front of the LB,
the tackle is made. I see this phase as 50% athletic ability (can they run
hard, throw or catch the ball, make the tackle, etc.), 25% coaching (refining
those skills the kids have as athletes), and 25% pure will and effort.
Assuming a 66/34
split between set-up and execution, that means that athletic ability is only a
total of about 34% of the equation here. I personally think that sounds about
right. Coaching is about 42%. That leaves nearly 25% in the hands of the kids
on game day – how well will they mentally follow the game plan, how much effort
will they put in? That 25% is why you see a swing in how teams perform week to
week.
The whole point is
that such a huge difference can be made in any week with just the proper state
of mind. We obviously aren’t going to change our athletic ability at this
point in the game, and both Delhi and Walton are blessed with coaches that know
X’s and O’s like few others. If we win, it’s with above and
beyond effort and buying in to the coaching plan and in to what your teammates are doing around you.
Last week I
mentioned how I’d love to see us crank the speed and intensity up just a
bit now that it was playoff time. I saw a superb example of that. Jack Fletcher
has always been a hardnosed runner, but in his effort last week, I saw a senior
that definitely did NOT want to play his last game. I could not believe some of
the extra 2-4 yards he picked up on so many occasions, especially on the play
right before the first score, when he was driving 4 Candor players for 2-3
yards. I actually thought the effort in the “execution” phase was
great from all the backs (we just need to hang on the ball when fighting for
yards!), and Fletcher certainly led the way.
If there’s
anywhere in that execution phase we could improve, it is certainly in the
tackling department. It seems like it’s been an issue all season. Open
field tackles aren’t easy to make, but at the stage we are playing right
now, they are absolutely necessary. Wrap it up hard, and hold on tight!
Back to Fletcher,
in reading through some of my material from the past couple years, and in
thinking about him being ever so close to the school rushing record (I’m
pretty sure on that), I really don’t think I’ve given him nearly
enough press. I’ve always thought the world of him as a player, I just
have kind of taken him for granted in these opinion pieces I’ve written.
I’ve always been on the lookout of other aspects of the game where we
could complement him, but you should know that he is exactly what the doctor
ordered…..a big, strong, tough as nails player for both sides of the
ball. It would be tough to ask for anything better for this level we play at.
After 2-3 games when he was a freshman, I said that he was our next Brian
Neale, and I haven’t been the least bit disappointed. That statement was
right on the mark I think.
We know how to beat
Walton. Executing on that is a different story. Let’s see what we can do
Saturday.
Dominance of
Eastern Culture – with this year’s Class C and D finals featuring
teams exclusively from east of I-81, I got to adding up championships since the
state championship era started in 1993. In Class D, the east has won 13
championships in that time, to 4 for the west. In Class C, it is the same
margin, 13-4 for the east. I also looked at Class B, which is a bit different,
because the teams are different than the Sus vs. IAC
type teams being compared in the other classes. Regardless, even there the
advantage is 12 for the east and 5 for the west. Note, however that 3 of the “west”
teams that won were Sus Valley, Maine-Endwell, and
Johnson City, which are basically Binghamton-area schools, as opposed to
schools being truly out in the Elmira/Ithaca/Owego direction. It’s tough
to say why the east dominates like that. Some of it has been Walton’s
dominance I think – having a team that is that good every single year
makes any other schools with a shot step up their game to have a chance to get
by Walton. Other than that, I don’t know. They obviously have good
athletes out that way, as demonstrated by how well they fare in sports like
basketball, wrestling, and track.
Picks, all good
things must come to an end, and this past week I lost out on BOTH my ability to
pick games and my ability to pick how well I’d do. I went 7-2 on the
playoffs and 7-3 on the crossovers for a 14-5 (0.737) showing. I had predicted
8-1 and 8-2, so I was off by 2 games total in the wrong direction. 0.800 is
completely out of mathematical question now, as my season total is 146-42
(0.777). I hope to catch 2 or 3 of the IVFINALS…..wish the weather weren’t
looking so icky. I’ll go with….Corning 44, Binghamton 22; Maine-Endwell
30, EFA 26; Owego 22, Chenango Valley 14; Forks 32, Sidney 28 (offenses slowed
a bit in the cooler weather). Note that in my picks before the season started I
had Corning over Bingo, Maine-Endwell over Southside, Johnson
City over Oneonta, and Forks over Sidney, so I don’t think that’s
too bad! I did only get 3 of 7 division titlists correct, though 2 of the other
champs I picked got 2nd place, and 1 team (Whitney Point) actually
beat their division champ by 2 TD’s.